2 of 2
2
Questions that came up in play….
Posted: 16 February 2010 03:50 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Fourth Level Ascended
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  595
Joined  2009-12-31

Ok, but since you are only allowed to spend 1 endurance point, you lower the exertion by only 1 point, and you still cannot go over the max number of attacks for a weapon.
So for your knife example, the dagger entry in CRB says Exertion is 4 and Max attacks is 4.
So if you spend 1 endurance point to lower the exertion to 3, then you can still only hit 4 times becaus of the max attacks.

So for example, let’s say the base defense would be a 10 for your target… you would hit on a 10/14/18/22 normally
Now if you apply your endurance point to exertion for the knife… you would hit on 10/13/16/19.

In the grand scheme of things, that lowered exertion might allow one extra hit, maybe two.
And since the dagger only does 1d6 of damage, and melee kinetic damage is applied to each strike, you might do 2 - 6 points extra damage if you roll very well and the target is wearing light armor.

Now let’s take that to another extreme and say you are using the Long Spear (did not use 2 Handed Axe because that is still only 1 attack per segment).
With that same base defense of 10 for your target… you would hit on a 10/21 normally
If you apply that same point of endurance to reduce the exertion… you hit on a 10/20.

I fail to see how this is a game breaker in either of the extreme cases. I don’t see anyone getting torn to shreds in the manner you fear.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 February 2010 09:25 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Aspirant
Avatar
Total Posts:  11
Joined 

I think maybe you need to read the first part of this forum again.  He asked if you should be limited to lowering the exertion rating by one for each segment.  I stated “yes” because it would allow someone to lower the exertion rating to one, which would easily warrant multiple successful attacks with a weapon, like perhaps a knife, or any other object.  So my arguement is exactly what you’re stating, not the opposite.  The opposite would be that someone could, if the GM allowed, lower the exertion rating as low as they want for the endurance.
I think we had a misunderstanding, but I did appreciate your examples and advice.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 February 2010 09:29 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]
Fourth Level Ascended
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  595
Joined  2009-12-31

Sorry, I thought we had answered that question and moved on to whether or not Endurance should be allowed to be applied to the exertion rating of a ranged weapon as well.
So yes we agree smile

Profile
 
 
Posted: 20 March 2010 09:01 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 19 ]
Aspirant
Avatar
Total Posts:  5
Joined  2010-03-20

Hi from a new player of AO!!

My first question concerns endurance and was talked about here.  So is it RAW that you can only spend one endurance point per application of endurance?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 21 March 2010 09:51 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 20 ]
Fourth Level Ascended
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  595
Joined  2009-12-31

That is the current consensus. The only exception I think is for reducing wielding time, which has a specific table.

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 2
2